Additive intercropping green manure enhances maize water productivity through water competition and compensation under reduced nitrogen fertilizer application

Hanting Li, Guocui Wang, Falong Hu, Zhilong Fan, Wen Yin, Weidong Cao, Qiang Chai and Tuo Yao

Agricultural Water Management, 2025, vol. 311, issue C

Abstract: Excessive reliance on chemical nitrogen fertilizers and low crop water productivity (WP) in monoculture maize necessitate innovative cropping adjustments. Additive intercropping green manure crop into maize systems, while maintaining maize plant density and reducing chemical nitrogen inputs, promises to achieve stable yields and improve WP. A field experiment conducted from 2019 to 2021 in a northwestern China oasis irrigation area used a split-plot design with three replications. Main plots included maize intercropped with common vetch (IM1), maize intercropped with rape (IM2), and sole maize (SM). Subplots consisted of a 25 % reduced nitrogen amount (N1: 270 kg N ha−1) and local conventional nitrogen amount (N2: 360 kg N ha−1). Results indicated that intercropping reduced total evapotranspiration (ET) compared to sole maize. Nitrogen reduction amplified the decrease in total ET within the intercropping system. In sole maize, N1 decreased WP by 5.5 %-15.2 % compared to N2. However, both IM1 and IM2 mitigated WP declines caused by N1. IM1N1 exhibited higher WP than IM2N1 (P < 0.05). The differences in soil water content between the inter-strips revealed competition above the 30 cm soil layer during green manure growth, followed by compensation across entire soil layers after clipping. Water movement potential was used to evaluate intercropping water dynamics, showing that IM1N1 minimized water competition during the green manure growth period and maximized water compensation after green manure clipping. In conclusion, intercropping with green manure, particularly common vetch, presents a sustainable and effective strategy for enhancing maize water productivity under reduced nitrogen input in arid regions.

Keywords: Arid areas; Soil water content; Water movement potential; Evapotranspiration; Water productivity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377425001027
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:311:y:2025:i:c:s0378377425001027

DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109388

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Water Management is currently edited by B.E. Clothier, W. Dierickx, J. Oster and D. Wichelns

More articles in Agricultural Water Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().