Economic benefits of combined open ditch and subsurface drainage based on the new calculation method considering both surface and subsurface waterlogging

Yuan Tao, Jing Liu, Xiaoyan Guan, Cui Zhou, Haorui Chen and Hejing Ren

Agricultural Water Management, 2025, vol. 317, issue C

Abstract: To better promote the combined surface and subsurface drainage combined drainage system, the economic benefit analysis is a crucial step. In flat plains and low-lying areas, it is difficult to remove all surface ponding solely through runoff. The subsurface drainage system is required to assist in the removal of surface ponding, especially where surface runoff is insufficiently low. However, in traditional designs, the effect of subsurface drainage on surface waterlogging removal is often neglected, as the system is usually designed to meet only subsurface waterlogging requirements. This paper proposes a new calculation method for the design of combined open ditch and subsurface drainage systems that considers both surface and subsurface waterlogging by introducing SDCSW parameter. The drain spacing and SDCSW obtained with HYDRUS are employed to verify the rationality of the proposed method. Then the economic benefits of the combined open ditch and subsurface drainage system were evaluated based on this new calculation method. The results indicate that the proposed method is feasible. Conventional subsurface drainage can remove approximately 15 % of surface ponding, while improved subsurface drainage with a 0.2 m-wide filter achieved removal rates of 19–23 %, provided drain spacing satisfied the subsurface waterlogging criterion. The ENPV of conventional subsurface drainage, improved subsurface drainage with a 0.2 m-wide filter, improved subsurface drainage with a 0.6 m-wide filter, and open ditch systems were 2315, 2186, 1635, and 1848 USD/ha, with corresponding economic benefit-cost ratios of 2.9, 2.6, 1.3, and 2.3 when drain depths were 0.8 m, respectively. At SDCSW = 0.8, the ENPV of the combined open ditch and improved subsurface drainage with a drain depth of 0.8 m and a 0.2 m-width filter, was 2231 USD/ha, representing 1.6 times that of the open ditch system but 2.6 % less than the combined open ditch and conventional subsurface drainage system (2293 USD/ha). The analysis also indicated that replacing gravel filter with straw in the improved subsurface drainage system would significantly increase ENPV. These findings contribute to advancing the design theory of combined open ditch and subsurface drainage systems and provide valuable references for their broader implementation and adoption.

Keywords: Combined open ditch and subsurface drainage; Surface and subsurface waterlogging; Drain spacing; SDCSW; Calculation method; Economic benefit (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377425003610
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:317:y:2025:i:c:s0378377425003610

DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109647

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Water Management is currently edited by B.E. Clothier, W. Dierickx, J. Oster and D. Wichelns

More articles in Agricultural Water Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().