Winter canola water use response under dormant and growth stage based irrigation strategies

Paramveer Singh, Sangu Angadi, Sultan Begna, Michael J. Stamm, Brian J. Schutte and Dawn VanLeeuwen

Agricultural Water Management, 2025, vol. 319, issue C

Abstract: Declining Ogallala Aquifer in the semiarid southern High Plains (SHP) is threatening highly productive irrigated agriculture. Winter canola (Brassica napus L.) requires less irrigation water than traditional crops. Identifying irrigation strategy that skips irrigation at less critical growth stage or refills soil profile during dormant period to further reduce irrigation inputs may improve sustainability of Ogallala Aquifer. A field study was conducted at Clovis, NM during 2017–18 and 2018–19 seasons using two cultivars (cvs. Hekip and Riley) to assess soil water extraction patterns (SWE), and water productivity (WP) under various irrigation regimes. Main plot treatments consisted of with (DPI) and without (NDPI) dormant period irrigation, while growth stage-based irrigations included FI (irrigation throughout the season), VS (no irrigation before first blossom), RS (no irrigation after first blossom), and RD (no irrigation after establishment) as the sub-plot treatments. The DPI significantly increased SWE, consumptive water use, biomass (BY) and seed yield (SY). However, extra water extracted in DPI did not improve WPBY & SY. Irrigation restrictions during any part of the growing season were detrimental as compared to continuous irrigation. However, restricting irrigation to the first blossom stage was less impactful, as the VS treatment had higher yields and WPs than the RS and RD treatment. There was marginal effect of cultivar-type on SWE, and WPs. To summarize, winter canola was able to tap into stored dormant irrigation but was not effectively used in yield formation. Growers with limited irrigation can implement in-season VS regime without significant yield loss or WP.

Keywords: Water scarcity; Crop diversification; Soil water extraction (SWE); Consumptive water use (CWU); Water productivity (WP) (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377425005219
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:319:y:2025:i:c:s0378377425005219

DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109807

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Water Management is currently edited by B.E. Clothier, W. Dierickx, J. Oster and D. Wichelns

More articles in Agricultural Water Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().