Improved water capture and erosion reduction through furrow diking

C.C. Truman and R.C. Nuti

Agricultural Water Management, 2009, vol. 96, issue 7, 1071-1077

Abstract: Crop production in Georgia and the Southeastern U.S. can be limited by water; thus, supplemental irrigation is often needed to sustain profitable crop production. Increased water capture would efficiently improve water use and reduce irrigation amounts and other input costs, thus improving producer's profit margin. We quantified water capturing and erosional characteristics of furrow diking by comparing runoff (R) and soil loss (E) from furrow diked (DT) and non-furrow diked tilled (CT) systems. A field study (Faceville loamy sand, Typic Kandiudult) was established (2006 and 2007) near Dawson, GA with DT and CT systems managed to irrigated cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Treatments included: DT vs. CT; DT with and without shank (+/- S); and rainfall simulation performed (0, 60 days after tillage, DAT). Simulated rainfall (50mmh-1 for 1h) was applied to all 2mx3m plots (n=3). All runoff and E were measured from each flat, level sloping 6-m2 plot (slope=1%). Compared to CT, DT decreased R and E by 14-28% and 2.0-2.8 times, respectively. Compared to DT-S, DT+S decreased R and E by 17-56% and 26% to 2.1 times, respectively. Compared to sealed/crusted soil conditions at 60 DAT, simulating rainfall on a freshly tilled seedbed condition (DAT=0) decreased R by 69% to 3.4 times and increased E by 27%. DT0+S+RF0 plots (best-case scenario) had 2.8 times less R, and 2.6 times less E than CT-S+RF60 plots (worst-case). Based on $1.17ha-mm-1 to pump irrigation water and $18.50ha-1 for DT, a producer in the Coastal Plain region of Georgia would recover cost of DT by saving the first 16ha-mm of water. The DT+S system is a cost-effective management practice for producers in Georgia and the Southeastern U.S. that positively impacts natural resource conservation, producer profit margins, and environmental quality.

Keywords: Tillage; Runoff; Water; savings; Soil; loss (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378-3774(08)00320-X
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:96:y:2009:i:7:p:1071-1077

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Water Management is currently edited by B.E. Clothier, W. Dierickx, J. Oster and D. Wichelns

More articles in Agricultural Water Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().