Do auditor judgment frameworks help in constraining aggressive reporting? Evidence under more precise and less precise accounting standards

Ann G. Backof, E. Michael Bamber and Tina D. Carpenter

Accounting, Organizations and Society, 2016, vol. 51, issue C, 1-11

Abstract: We experimentally investigate whether alternative judgment frameworks help Big 4 audit managers and partners constrain management's aggressive financial reporting under accounting standards that differ in their precision. We find that a framework based on the SEC's Advisory Committee on Improvements to Financial Reporting's (CIFiR's) recommendation that auditors critically evaluate the pros and cons of alternative accounting methods helps auditors constrain aggressive reporting under less precise standards. While our results highlight a limitation of counterfactual reasoning on its own at enhancing auditors' constraint of aggressive reporting, this study provides evidence on how structured thinking can overcome this limitation. In particular, we find that combining this consideration of the alternatives with a structured thought process that encourages auditors to think about the issue at increasing levels of abstraction effectively shifts auditors' focus away from client considerations and towards substance-over-form considerations, thereby incrementally enhancing auditors' constraint of aggressive reporting across different levels of accounting standard precision. These results should be of interest to academics, regulators, standard-setters, and auditors as they continue to contemplate ways to improve auditors' professional judgments under different levels of accounting standard precision.

Keywords: Auditing; Accounting standard precision; Judgment frameworks; Psychological distance; Abstract mindsets (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361368216300332
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:aosoci:v:51:y:2016:i:c:p:1-11

DOI: 10.1016/j.aos.2016.03.004

Access Statistics for this article

Accounting, Organizations and Society is currently edited by Christopher Chapman

More articles in Accounting, Organizations and Society from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().