 The Washington Consensus: A post-mortemRobert K. McCleery and Fernando De Paolis Journal of Asian Economics, 2008, vol. 19, issue 5-6, 438-446 Abstract: After guiding development policies for nearly 20 years, the "Washington Consensus" lies in shambles. Although selected components remain relevant for development policies around the world, some specifics of the broader policy "package" and, more generally, the concept of a standardized package of policies applicable to all developing countries has clearly been discredited. Criticism has been directed at the assumed link from economic liberalization of international trade and financial flows to more rapid economic growth. Apart from a handful of developing countries, admittedly including some large and important ones, most of the world saw little of the promised economic benefit from widespread and on-going trade and financial liberalization, initially. Many countries actually regressed, when evaluated against broader socio-economic development goals, including income inequality. We conclude that differences in initial conditions (history, culture, geography and levels of industrial and institutional development) preclude any single development policy package from being universally effective. Keywords: Trade; liberalization; Financial; liberalization; Governance; institutions; Income; inequality; Washington; Consensus (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:asieco:v:19:y:2008:i:5-6:p:438-446 Access Statistics for this article Journal of Asian Economics is currently edited by C. Wiemer More articles in Journal of Asian Economics from Elsevier |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.