Optimistic, but selling riskier stocks—An arbitrage experiment in crisis market

Doron Sonsino () and Tal Shavit ()

Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 2014, vol. 1, issue C, 61-73

Abstract: The field-based experimental approach was utilized to collect zero-investment portfolios from more than 100 competent investors at the peak of the financial crisis. The average annual return on 117 arbitrage portfolios was 5.2% with 55% profitability rate, but prior self-confidence strongly correlates with eventual performance with yearly returns reaching 26% for the highest confidence quartile. The stocks selected for short-sale were riskier than the stocks selected for purchase and time-series estimations show that the unbalanced positions diminished profitability while markets recuperated. As most participants anticipated the recovery at the time of decision, the selling of riskier stocks suggests that “misperception of financial risk” (Shefrin, 1999) impaired performance.

Date: 2014
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214635014000070

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:beexfi:v:1:y:2014:i:c:p:61-73

DOI: 10.1016/j.jbef.2014.01.004

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance is currently edited by Michael Dowling and Jürgen Huber

More articles in Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().