The Luckin Coffee scandal and short selling attacks
Yahui Yang and
Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 2022, vol. 34, issue C
Luckin Coffee, extolled as the Chinese challenger to Starbucks, has been targeted by short sellers since its initial public offering. During its 13-month listing on NASDAQ, Luckin suffered at least seven short selling attacks. These attacks, although unsuccessful until Luckin’s own confession of fraud, led to Luckin’s subsequent delisting and created an adverse chain reaction in two related companies. Despite this setback, Luckin took a turn for the better in terms of revenue and survived the scandal. In this study, we examine short seller behavior in attacking Luckin and discuss why attacks can be repetitive. We find that after short sellers explicitly announce their intent, the return comovement of related companies increases. Moreover, we show that short selling is highly risky, as ill-timed attacks can cause large losses due to a short squeeze.
Keywords: Financial fraud; Short seller behavior; Short selling attack; Short squeeze (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G14 G18 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:beexfi:v:34:y:2022:i:c:s221463502200003x
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance is currently edited by Michael Dowling and JÃ¼rgen Huber
More articles in Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().