Practitioner perspectives on the seasoned equity offering process in the UK
Bruce Burton,
Christine Helliar and
David Power
The British Accounting Review, 2005, vol. 37, issue 2, 153-175
Abstract:
Institutional practices around the time of equity offers by listed firms have recently been the subject of scrutiny by UK regulatory authorities including the former Monopolies and Mergers Commission. Moreover, several published studies indicate that managers in both Britain and the US continue to make extensive use of the equity issue methods that cause the most harm to shareholders' wealth. To investigate how and why firms decide between alternative offering methods, this paper reports the results of 11 interviews conducted with various parties involved in the share issue process in the UK, including industrial firms, accountants and advisers, as well as a questionnaire sent to the senior management of companies with recent experience of making share offers. The results indicate: (i) that the decision is contingent on the combined impact of a range of factors, particularly input from advisers and (ii) that a case can be made for re-examining the stringency of the UK's pre-emption guidelines.
Keywords: Practitioner; Seasoned equity offer; Investor protection committee (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2005
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890838904000897
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:bracre:v:37:y:2005:i:2:p:153-175
DOI: 10.1016/j.bar.2004.09.005
Access Statistics for this article
The British Accounting Review is currently edited by Nathan Lael Joseph and Alan Lowe
More articles in The British Accounting Review from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu (repec@elsevier.com).