Accounting, board independence and contagion effects from adverse press comment: The case of Elan

Ray Donnelly

The British Accounting Review, 2008, vol. 40, issue 3, 245-259

Abstract: In early 2002 the Wall Street Journal published a damning article concerning the accounting methods used by Elan Corporation plc, which was the largest company quoted on the Irish Stock Market at the time. Consequently, the share price of Elan and some other Irish companies fell significantly. This paper evaluates whether Irish companies which had relatively good governance, in terms of their board structure, performed better than those with weaker governance at the time of the Elan scandal. It is reported that the average return of Irish companies other than Elan was not adversely affected over the event period. However, there was a differential reaction across companies depending on the quality of their corporate governance. Those with a less independent board structure lost out by about 4.2% over a three-day period compared with those with more independently structured boards of directors.

Keywords: Corporate governance; Abnormal returns; Accounting information (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2008
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890838908000449
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:bracre:v:40:y:2008:i:3:p:245-259

DOI: 10.1016/j.bar.2008.03.002

Access Statistics for this article

The British Accounting Review is currently edited by Nathan Lael Joseph and Alan Lowe

More articles in The British Accounting Review from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().