The relationship between cost system complexity, purposes of use, and cost system effectiveness

Martijn Schoute

The British Accounting Review, 2009, vol. 41, issue 4, 208-226

Abstract: This paper uses survey data from 133 Dutch, medium-sized manufacturing firms to examine the associations between cost system complexity (in terms of the applied overhead absorption procedures), purposes of use, and cost system effectiveness. First, factor analysis identifies two underlying dimensions of cost system purposes of use, which refers to the range (scope) of purposes for which the cost system is used, among nine widely used purposes: cost system usage for product planning and cost management purposes. Next, the joint effect of cost system complexity and usage for product planning and cost management purposes on cost system effectiveness, as proxied by the intensity of use of and level of satisfaction with the cost system, is examined. The results robustly indicate that at higher (lower) levels of usage for product planning purposes, cost system complexity negatively (positively) affects cost system intensity of use, while at higher (lower) levels of usage for cost management purposes, cost system complexity positively (negatively) affects cost system intensity of use and satisfaction. This implies that when cost system design (i.e., its level of complexity) and its purposes of use are better aligned, the cost system is more effective.

Keywords: Cost system design; Overhead absorption procedures; Purposes of use; Cost system effectiveness (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890838909000602
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:bracre:v:41:y:2009:i:4:p:208-226

DOI: 10.1016/j.bar.2009.10.001

Access Statistics for this article

The British Accounting Review is currently edited by Nathan Lael Joseph and Alan Lowe

More articles in The British Accounting Review from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().