Audit committees, non-audit services, and auditor reporting decisions prior to failure
Chloe Yu-Hsuan Wu,
Hwa-Hsien Hsu and
Jim Haslam
The British Accounting Review, 2016, vol. 48, issue 2, 240-256
Abstract:
This study investigates the associations between audit committee characteristics and the likelihood of auditors' going-concern decisions among UK failed firms. Specifically, we examine whether the threat posed by auditor-provided non-audit services (NAS) to auditors' reporting decisions is mediated by audit committee characteristics. We find that failed firms with higher proportions of independent non-executive directors (NEDs) and financial experts on the audit committee are more likely to receive auditor going-concern modifications prior to failure, but that there is no significant relationship between NAS fees and the likelihood of receiving a going-concern modification. The evidence further suggests that the association between NAS and auditors' reporting decisions is subject to audit committee characteristics. Where the audit committee is more independent and includes a greater proportion of financial experts, auditors providing the client with NAS are less likely to issue a standard unmodified going-concern report prior to failure. Overall, the findings provide support for corporate governance regulators' concerns about the monitoring benefits of audit committee independence and the presence of financial expertise on the audit committee for auditors' reporting decisions.
Keywords: Audit committee; Corporate governance; Non-audit services fees; Going-concern report; Corporate failure (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (14)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890838915000153
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:bracre:v:48:y:2016:i:2:p:240-256
DOI: 10.1016/j.bar.2015.03.001
Access Statistics for this article
The British Accounting Review is currently edited by Nathan Lael Joseph and Alan Lowe
More articles in The British Accounting Review from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().