Socially responsible investment portfolios: Does the optimization process matter?
Emmanouil Platanakis and
Charles Sutcliffe ()
The British Accounting Review, 2018, vol. 50, issue 4, 379-401
This study investigates the impact of the choice of optimization technique when constructing Socially Responsible Investment (SRI) portfolios. Corporate Social Performance (CSP) scores are price sensitive information that is subject to considerable estimation risk. Therefore, uncertainty in the input parameters is greater for SRI portfolios than conventional portfolios, and this affects the selection of the appropriate optimization method. We form SRI portfolios based on six different approaches and compare their performance along the dimensions of risk, risk-return trade-off, diversification and stability. Our results for SRI portfolios contradict those of the conventional portfolio optimization literature. We find that the more “formal” optimization approaches (Black-Litterman, Markowitz and robust estimation) lead to SRI portfolios that are both less risky and have superior risk-return trade-offs than do more simplistic approaches; although they also have more unstable asset allocations and lower diversification. Our conclusions are robust to a series of tests, including the use of different estimation windows and stricter screening criteria.
Keywords: Corporate social responsibility; CSR; CSP; SRI; Sustainability; Portfolio optimization (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C61 G11 M14 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:bracre:v:50:y:2018:i:4:p:379-401
Access Statistics for this article
The British Accounting Review is currently edited by Nathan Lael Joseph and Alan Lowe
More articles in The British Accounting Review from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dana Niculescu ().