Reflections on some of the formative years of the British Accounting Review: Thoughts of ducklings and swans

Rob Gray and Bob Perks

The British Accounting Review, 2018, vol. 50, issue 6, 580-587

Abstract: Between 1978 and 2004 we were engaged in a variety of editorial roles with the British Accounting Review, its forerunner (The AUTA Review) and (what became) The British Accounting Review Research Register. This was a period of considerable change for both the journal and the Association. In this short essay, we look back on those 26 years, describing (as we see it) the changes and the reasons for them and indulge in a little reflection on some of the positives and negatives that have flowed around the journal over this period and up to the present.

Keywords: British Accounting Review; Editorial experience; Retrospective; Collegiality; British Accounting Association (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890838918300192
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:bracre:v:50:y:2018:i:6:p:580-587

DOI: 10.1016/j.bar.2018.02.002

Access Statistics for this article

The British Accounting Review is currently edited by Nathan Lael Joseph and Alan Lowe

More articles in The British Accounting Review from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().