Endogenous gradualism and the Slovenian puzzle

Janez Šušteršič

China Economic Review, 2009, vol. 20, issue 2, 265-274

Abstract: We use EBRD transition index to classify transition countries into gradualist and orthodox reformers. When comparing this classification with records of economic and political reforms before the breakdown of socialism, an apparent historical regularity emerges. Countries where transition was to an extent »endogenous« were more likely to choose a gradualist strategy, whereas countries where a strict socialist regime was upheld until its breakdown, were more likely to decide for an orthodox »big-bang« approach to transition. Some political economy explanations for this regularity are suggested. The second part of the paper explores Slovenia's experience in some detail. We present the discussion on the benefits and pitfalls of its gradual approach to reforms, showing that gradualism may slow down important structural reforms in the second phase of transition and thus negatively affect competitiveness and the long-run growth performance of a country. Moreover, since the gradualist approach to transition has increased institutional rigidity and created a kind of political economic equilibrium, an »endogenous« changeover to a more dynamic reform agenda is unlikely. We report on the recent more ambitious structural reforms agenda introduced in the country and conclude that it amounts to merely a »gradual move away from gradualism«. We conclude by offering some tentative political economy interpretations of these developments.

Keywords: Transition; Gradualism; Slovenia (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043-951X(08)00072-2
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:chieco:v:20:y:2009:i:2:p:265-274

Access Statistics for this article

China Economic Review is currently edited by B.M. Fleisher, K. X. D. Huang, M.E. Lovely, Y. Wen, X. Zhang and X. Zhu

More articles in China Economic Review from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().