Beyond Russell reconstitution: A re-examination of methodologies for natural experiments

Wei Wei and Alex Young

Journal of Corporate Finance, 2025, vol. 91, issue C

Abstract: We develop a framework for screening and validating empirical designs in natural experiments. As an illustration of the framework, we establish a common testing ground for three popular research designs – instrumental variables (IV), fuzzy regression discontinuity (FRD), and difference-in-differences (DiD) – that exploit the annual Russell 1000/2000 Indexes reconstitution. Of the three designs, we find that only the IV approach spuriously detects large and statistically significant “effects” that by construction should be immaterial and statistically indistinguishable from zero. We advocate the use of simulation evidence to support key identifying assumptions for future research designs based on natural experiments.

Keywords: Treatment effects; Spurious results; Simulation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929119924001470
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:corfin:v:91:y:2025:i:c:s0929119924001470

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2024.102685

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Corporate Finance is currently edited by A. Poulsen and J. Netter

More articles in Journal of Corporate Finance from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().