Institutional voids and business group dynamics: Evidence from judicial reform in China11We gratefully acknowledge financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 71772039)，National Social Science Foundation of China (No. 21&ZD144), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities in UIBE (CXTD14–01), the Postgraduate Innovative Research Fund of University of International Business and Economics (No. 202509), and Taishan Young Talent Scholar Project of Shandong Province (No. 20221116)

Xingxing Hu, Bingxuan Lin, Huilong Liu and Xiaowei Xu

Journal of Corporate Finance, 2025, vol. 95, issue C

Abstract: The influence of external institutional environments on the internal functioning of business groups remains a critical yet underexplored area of research. In this paper, we focus on China's pro-market judicial reforms and examine how these reforms affect internal product and service transactions within business groups, finding that such reforms significantly reduce intra-group transactions. We further demonstrate that this decline reflects a strategic substitution toward external market transactions rather than an overall contraction in firm operations, and that the effect is not driven by managerial self-dealing but aligns with institutional voids theory. The effect is particularly pronounced in regions with underdeveloped product markets and weaker informal institutions, and in firms with lower reputations and stronger political connections. Moreover, our results hold consistently across various transaction types, whether seller- or buyer-initiated, service- or goods-related, and remain robust across alternative regression models, explanations, and regardless of the geographic proximity of group firms. These findings contribute to understanding the role of internal transactions within business groups in addressing institutional voids and add to the broader literature on how business groups emerge and adapt in response to gaps in institutional frameworks.

Keywords: Institutional voids theory; Business group; Internal market; Chinese judicial reform (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929119925001622
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:corfin:v:95:y:2025:i:c:s0929119925001622

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2025.102894

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Corporate Finance is currently edited by A. Poulsen and J. Netter

More articles in Journal of Corporate Finance from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().