Accounting for power and control: The Anglo-Iranian oil nationalisation of 1951

Neveen Abdelrehim (), Josephine Maltby and Steven Toms

CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, 2012, vol. 23, issue 7, 595-607

Abstract: The paper uses accounting and stock market data to evaluate the power of protagonists in a political crisis and their respective ability to assert control over disputed assets. It employs a case study of the expropriation of the assets of the AIOC by the Iranian government in 1951. An event study and accounting data analysis show that the stock market reaction to the nationalisation strongly predicted the ability of the company to recover its assets implying a significant market value associated with political support. They also show that the company was able to use the publication of its annual report to reassure shareholders and that due to the assumed presence of political support this signal was received as credible.

Keywords: Critical; Public interest; Political economy; Oil industry; Financial reporting; Critique; Intérêt public; 批判性; 公共利益; Crítica; Interés público (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1045235412000573
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:crpeac:v:23:y:2012:i:7:p:595-607

DOI: 10.1016/j.cpa.2012.04.003

Access Statistics for this article

CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING is currently edited by Marcia Annisette, Christine Cooper and Yves Gendron

More articles in CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().