Journal ranking effects on junior academics: Identity fragmentation and politicization

Bertrand Malsch and Sophie Tessier

CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, 2015, vol. 26, issue C, 84-98

Abstract: In this paper, drawing on autoethnographic material, we document how we have been responding to our school's research incentive policy and its adoption of a new journal ranking process that has resulted in the marginalization of most accounting journals. Overall, we contribute to the accounting literature on journal rankings by reflecting on their impact on researchers’ identities. Our personal narratives illustrate how journal rankings, embedded in a research incentive policy, can fragment and politicize junior faculties’ identities, driving them, professionally and intellectually, into contradictory directions and throwing them into academic politics. In terms of sustainability, identity fragmentation and identity politicization are ambivalent processes. They can marginalize junior researchers who do not have the political skills required to play the games of academic politics and discourage those who feel trapped in identity conflicts. On the other hand, identity fragmentation and politicization can also stimulate a deeper form of reflexivity and action. Through increased awareness of self and the political stakes of the field, junior researchers might be able to promote greater diversity and respond actively to the needs of a sustainable accounting research environment.

Keywords: Autoethnography; Accounting research; Identity; Journal ranking; Sustainability (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (32)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1045235414000379
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:crpeac:v:26:y:2015:i:c:p:84-98

DOI: 10.1016/j.cpa.2014.02.006

Access Statistics for this article

CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING is currently edited by Marcia Annisette, Christine Cooper and Yves Gendron

More articles in CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().