A comparison of some confidence intervals for the mean quality-adjusted lifetime with censored data

Hongkun Wang and Yichuan Zhao

Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 2009, vol. 53, issue 7, 2733-2739

Abstract: Quality-adjusted lifetime (QAL) has been playing an important role in clinical trials to evaluate treatments for chronic diseases. Much research has been focused on estimating the mean QAL when the data are subject to right censoring. The estimated mean QAL is often presented with a confidence interval, obtained by using either the available variance estimator or the bootstrapping method. However, no research has shown which method yields confidence intervals with better coverage probability and shorter length, especially when the sample size is not big. In this paper, we examine the confidence intervals obtained by some available methods for the mean QAL with censored data. Simulation studies are employed to compare the performance of these methods with various sample sizes and different censoring rates. Methods with the best performance will be identified. A data example from a breast cancer clinical trial study is used to illustrate the application of these methods.

Date: 2009
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-9473(09)00030-9
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:csdana:v:53:y:2009:i:7:p:2733-2739

Access Statistics for this article

Computational Statistics & Data Analysis is currently edited by S.P. Azen

More articles in Computational Statistics & Data Analysis from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().