EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Non-parametric k-sample tests: Density functions vs distribution functions

Pablo Martínez-Camblor and Jacobo de Uña-Álvarez

Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 2009, vol. 53, issue 9, 3344-3357

Abstract: Tests for the comparison of k samples based on kernel density estimators (KDE) are introduced. The Double Minimum method as a new and useful procedure for the crucial problem of bandwidth selection is developed. The statistical power of the proposed tests, as well as the impact of the smoothing degree and the performance of the Double Minimum algorithm, are studied via Monte Carlo simulations. Finally, the results of the tests based on the KDE are compared to those of the traditional k-sample tests based on empirical distribution functions (EDF), and to other tests based on the likelihood ratio introduced in the recent literature. Two main conclusions are obtained. First, the proposed bandwidth selection method attains quasi-optimal results. Second, the simulations suggest that KDE-based tests are the most powerful when the underlying populations are different in shape, and that the L1 distance among densities leads to optimal results in the considered situations.

Date: 2009
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-9473(09)00045-0
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:csdana:v:53:y:2009:i:9:p:3344-3357

Access Statistics for this article

Computational Statistics & Data Analysis is currently edited by S.P. Azen

More articles in Computational Statistics & Data Analysis from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:53:y:2009:i:9:p:3344-3357