A comparison of design and model selection methods for supersaturated experiments

Christopher J. Marley and David C. Woods

Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 2010, vol. 54, issue 12, 3158-3167

Abstract: Various design and model selection methods are available for supersaturated designs having more factors than runs but little research is available on their comparison and evaluation. Simulated experiments are used to evaluate the use of E(s2)-optimal and Bayesian D-optimal designs and to compare three analysis strategies representing regression, shrinkage and a novel model-averaging procedure. Suggestions are made for choosing the values of the tuning constants for each approach. Findings include that (i) the preferred analysis is via shrinkage; (ii) designs with similar numbers of runs and factors can be effective for a considerable number of active effects of only moderate size; and (iii)Â unbalanced designs can perform well. Some comments are made on the performance of the design and analysis methods when effect sparsity does not hold.

Keywords: Bayesian; D-optimal; designs; E(s2)-optimal; designs; Effect; sparsity; Gauss-Dantzig; selector; Main; effects; Screening; Simulation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-9473(10)00082-4
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:csdana:v:54:y:2010:i:12:p:3158-3167

Access Statistics for this article

Computational Statistics & Data Analysis is currently edited by S.P. Azen

More articles in Computational Statistics & Data Analysis from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().