A scoping review of when and how a child’s view is weighted in decision-making processes in law proceedings
Tina Gerdts-Andresen
Children and Youth Services Review, 2021, vol. 129, issue C
Abstract:
This article contributes to the growing debate about children’s participation in decision-making processes by creating an overview of research on how the child’s view is weighted in law proceedings. Eleven original publications met the eligibility criteria. Whereas eight of the studies examine how and when children’s opinions are considered in child protection law proceedings, three investigate the same theme within family law proceedings. Each study presents findings concerning if or when a child’s view is considered in the decision-making process. None of the studies, however, identifies “how” the child’s view is weighted in accordance with the child’s age, maturity and other factors involved in the decision-making process. Common to all is that children under the age of seven are generally not given the opportunity to express their views in child protection proceedings, and this occurs only rarely in child custody proceedings. Children above the age of seven were increasingly likely to be included as a factor in the decision. It is, however, unclear whether the child’s view is weighted or simply noted. Although awareness of children’s rights has increased, there still appears to be a discrepancy between the child’s right to participate and how this right is implemented in law proceedings, both within family law and child protection proceedings.
Keywords: Scoping review; Decision-making; Children’s view; Court proceedings; Participation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740921002735
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:129:y:2021:i:c:s0190740921002735
DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2021.106197
Access Statistics for this article
Children and Youth Services Review is currently edited by Duncan Lindsey
More articles in Children and Youth Services Review from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().