Should family group conferencing be assessed as a child and family rights participatory model or as an intervention Method? – A comprehensive quantitative Danish study measuring and discussing effects on both Dimensions

Bo Morthorst Rasmussen

Children and Youth Services Review, 2025, vol. 169, issue C

Abstract: Since the development of family group conferencing (FGC) in New Zealand, there has been ongoing debates on the model’s short-term and long-term effectiveness and how this should be measured. In general, family group conferencing can be approached as either a rights-based participatory approach or as an intervention method, akin to other social methodologies. This distinction leads to different criteria for assessment. In Denmark, a large-scale quantitative mixed methods study (N = 6286 participants in 1156 FGCs) was conducted in the period from 2014 to 2020 to examine the effects of both a rights-based and an intervention approach in the short-term and long-term and to discuss their interrelation. The findings indicate that family group conferencing scores highly in terms of both participatory effectiveness and intervention effectiveness. However, only the rights aspect is sustainable independently, but both dimensions can be measured and have importance. Furthermore, the interplay between these approaches provides unique insights into the participation of children and the extended family, and how it effects their hope and well-being in the short term. The research can hopefully contribute to the debate on how to assess FGC with an easily transferable model and in-depth empirical knowledge.

Keywords: Family Group Conference; Participatory models; Social work; Children and family rights (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740924006340
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:169:y:2025:i:c:s0190740924006340

DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2024.108062

Access Statistics for this article

Children and Youth Services Review is currently edited by Duncan Lindsey

More articles in Children and Youth Services Review from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().