Judicial case management in predicting length of stay in foster care

Sarah J. Beal, Twila Wingrove and Victoria Weisz

Children and Youth Services Review, 2014, vol. 44, issue C, 16-19

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to explore the effects of judicial case progression in predicting time to case closure using nested modeling to test case-, judge-, and district-level effects. Despite a national focus on streamlining the abuse/neglect court process, there has not been empirical evidence that judicial activities, as compared to activities by the child welfare agency, have a significant impact on the time children spend in foster care. Model results indicated that while district-level effects did not exist, a significant amount of variance was accounted for at the judge level—43.1% in 2008 and 39.2% in 2009. In particular, the timing of specific early stage hearings significantly predict time to case closure. These findings suggest that the rhetorical emphasis on increasing judicial control over case progression to facilitate timely case closure has some empirical basis.

Keywords: Child welfare; Case progression; Judicial decision making; Juvenile court (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740914001972
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:44:y:2014:i:c:p:16-19

DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.05.012

Access Statistics for this article

Children and Youth Services Review is currently edited by Duncan Lindsey

More articles in Children and Youth Services Review from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().