Quality improvement learning collaborative to examine foster care guidelines

Sandra Jee, Moira Szilagyi, Jan Schriefer, Anne-Marie Conn, Julia Weld, Philip V. Scribano, Linda Sagor, Heather Forkey, Janet Arnold-Clark, Adrienne Carmack, Chris Chytraus, LaRene Adams, David Harmon, Kelly Hodges, Mike Scahill, Tom Tonniges, Deb Shropshire and Stephen Meister

Children and Youth Services Review, 2015, vol. 59, issue C, 84-88

Abstract: Learning collaboratives (LC) are an important method of implementing quality improvement by serving as laboratories to translate research into practice and sharing knowledge. We created a Foster Care Learning Collaborative (FCLC) of 11 foster care health sites to share best practices on providing health services for children in foster care. Using a collaborative approach involving monthly conference calls, we invited each health site to present specific health care delivery issues for the purpose of developing collaborative quality improvement projects regarding the delivery of healthcare to children placed into foster care. For health sites providing primary care (n=8 of 11 sites), we examined adherence to two American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) guidelines for children entering foster care: a) the initial health screen, and b) the comprehensive medical evaluations. At least four distinct types of health care models that provide either direct primary care or administrative oversight for children in foster care were identified: 1) medical home sites (n=3); 2) foster care evaluation/intake sites (n=2); 3) specialized primary care sites (n=1); and, 4) state administrative programs (n=2). Data from the six direct primary care sites (n=586 children) and two state administrative models (n=3855 children) was collected. The time-frame for the initial health screen was adjusted to 7days after entry and adherence (31%) was comparable among primary care sites. Adherence to AAP guidelines regarding completion of a comprehensive medical evaluation within 30days of intake varied among medical homes (30%–86%), intake models (23%–33%), specialized primary care site (43%), and state models (43%–73%). No site was fully compliant with the AAP guideline for universal comprehensive medical evaluation within 30days, and there is variation within and among care models. A foster care learning collaborative identified significant variability in adherence to a commonly accepted guideline for timely access to healthcare for children placed into foster care. The LC c model offers the opportunity to evaluate best practices, identify barriers to care, and provide objective feedback for improvement.

Keywords: Learning collaboratives; Quality improvement; Foster care; Evaluation; Health care standards; National guidelines (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740915300748
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:59:y:2015:i:c:p:84-88

DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.10.004

Access Statistics for this article

Children and Youth Services Review is currently edited by Duncan Lindsey

More articles in Children and Youth Services Review from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().