Patterns and priorities of service need identified through the Child and Adolescent Needs and Strengths (CANS) assessment

Katharan D. Cordell, Lonnie R. Snowden and Laura Hosier

Children and Youth Services Review, 2016, vol. 60, issue C, 129-135

Abstract: Using recursive partitioning on thousands of enrollment Child and Adolescent Needs and Strengths (CANS) assessments, we identified characteristics of the most troubled children/youth requiring comprehensive interventions reflected by a count of total actionable items (TAI) from 129 possible CANS actionable treatment planning items. Samples included 2557 and 6982 children/youth from two separate large, multi-program, California-based mental health treatment agencies administering CANS routinely upon enrollment. In two separate random forest analyses, 20 top predictors were identified which indicated very high levels of clinical severity needing comprehensive, urgent intervention at each agency, with 13 out of the 20 predictors common to both agencies' populations. Agency-specific decision trees were constructed with the top 20 predictors to examine relationships between predictors, which further identified four predictors of need highly prioritized at both agencies: child's frustration management problems, recreation and leisure time activity challenges, poor response to consequences for aggressive behavior, and lack of optimism. Within these service populations, children with actionable need for intervention in these four areas had four to five times more TAI as compared to children without these areas identified. A handful of the CANS items assessed can indicate very high severity ratings for a service population, and localized use of recursive partitioning analysis based on TAI can identify these core problems for specific programs or across agencies, helping clinicians to understand patterns and priorities within populations served.

Keywords: Children's mental health; Behavioral intervention; Child Adolescent Needs and Strengths (CANS); Assessment and treatment planning; Service needs (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740915301079
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:60:y:2016:i:c:p:129-135

DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.11.020

Access Statistics for this article

Children and Youth Services Review is currently edited by Duncan Lindsey

More articles in Children and Youth Services Review from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().