 Who wins, who loses? Understanding the spatially differentiated effects of the belt and road initiativeSomik V. Lall and Mathilde Lebrand Journal of Development Economics, 2020, vol. 146, issue C Abstract: This paper examines how cities and regions within countries adjust to trade openness and improved connectivity driven by large transport investments from China’s Belt and Road Initiative. The paper presents a general equilibrium model alongside spatially detailed information on the location of people, economic activity, and transport costs in Central Asia and China. The model builds on Fajgelbaum and Redding (2018) adding restrictions on internal mobility. We use this framework to identify which places are likely to gain and which places are likely to lose. The findings are that BRI transport investments favor development in larger urban districts near trade hubs, while people in more distant regions tend to lose out. Investments in trade facilitation are complementary policies that bring large additional welfare gains and can help in spatially spreading the benefits. However, barriers to internal labor mobility are likely to exacerbate wage inequalities while dampening overall welfare. Keywords: Transport corridors; Spatial general equilibrium; Territorial development; Labor mobility; Complementary policies (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:deveco:v:146:y:2020:i:c:s0304387820300717 DOI: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2020.102496 Access Statistics for this article Journal of Development Economics is currently edited by M. R. Rosenzweig More articles in Journal of Development Economics from Elsevier |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.