EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Do external interventions work? The case of trade reform conditions in IMF supported programs

Shang-Jin Wei and Zhiwei Zhang

Journal of Development Economics, 2010, vol. 92, issue 1, 71-81

Abstract: Trade reform conditions are common in IMF supported programs. Of the 99 countries that had IMF programs during 1993-2003, 77 had trade reform conditions in their programs. Since the WTO has not been found especially effective in promoting trade openness for most developing countries, it is of great interest to see if the IMF has been more effective as it combines carrots and sticks not available to the WTO. Yet, the effectiveness of these trade conditions has not been systematically studied. Using a unique dataset, this paper provides such an assessment. It finds that trade conditions are indeed associated with an increase in trade openness on average, but the effect comes mostly from countries that can be characterized by a high degree of "willingness to reform."

Keywords: Conditionality; Ownership; Openness (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (14)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304-3878(08)00132-6
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
Working Paper: Do External Interventions Work? The Case of Trade Reform Conditions in IMF Supported Programs (2006) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:deveco:v:92:y:2010:i:1:p:71-81

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Development Economics is currently edited by M. R. Rosenzweig

More articles in Journal of Development Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:deveco:v:92:y:2010:i:1:p:71-81