EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Limestone calcined clay cement as a low-carbon solution to meet expanding cement demand in emerging economies

Yudiesky Cancio Díaz, Sofia Sánchez Berriel, Urs Heierli, Aurélie R. Favier, Inocencio R. Sánchez Machado, Karen L. Scrivener, José Fernando Martirena Hernández and Guillaume Habert

Development Engineering, 2017, vol. 2, issue C, 82-91

Abstract: This paper aims at assessing the return on investment and carbon mitigation potentials of five investment alternatives for the Cuban cement industry in a long-term horizon appraisal (15 years). Anticipated growing demand for cement, constrained supply and an urgent need for optimisation of limited capital while preserving the environment, are background facts leading to the present study. This research explores the beneficial contribution of a new available technology, LC3 cement, resulting from the combination of clinker, calcined clay and limestone, with a capacity of replacing up to 50% of clinker in cement. Global Warming Potential (GWP) is calculated with Life Cycle Assessment method and the economic investment's payback is assessed through Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) approach. Main outcomes show that projected demand could be satisfied either by adding new cement plants—at a high environmental impact and unprofitable performance— or by introducing LC3 strategy. The latter choice allows boosting both the return on investment and the production capacity while reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions up to 20–23% compared to business-as-usual practice. Overall profitability for the industry is estimated to overcome BAU scenario by 8–10% points by 2025, if LC3 were adopted. Increasing the production of conventional blended cements instead brings only marginal economic benefits without supporting the needed increase in production capacity. The conducted study also shows that, in spite of the extra capital cost required for the calcination of kaolinite clay, LC3 drops production costs in the range of 15–25% compared to conventional solutions.

Keywords: Cement; Alternative; ROCE; CO2; LCA; Investment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352728516300240

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:deveng:v:2:y:2017:i:c:p:82-91

Access Statistics for this article

Development Engineering is currently edited by Paul J. GERTLER

More articles in Development Engineering from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dana Niculescu ().

 
Page updated 2018-04-28
Handle: RePEc:eee:deveng:v:2:y:2017:i:c:p:82-91