 What drives intraday reversal? illiquidity or liquidity oversupply?Junqing Kang, Shen Lin and Xiong Xiong Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2022, vol. 136, issue C Abstract: Previous studies of the U.S. market regard short-term reversal as compensation for liquidity provision. However, we find that intraday reversal has no significant dependence on stock liquidity in the Chinese market. Hence, based on a stylized framework, we propose an alternative explanation: irrational uninformed liquidity providers, who underestimate the information component in the equilibrium price due to physiological anchoring, trade against previous price movement, which generates an opposing price pressure. The empirical results confirm this explanation of liquidity oversupply (from irrational uninformed liquidity providers). The negative correlation between previous intraday returns and future returns in the Chinese market is reversed once we extend the holding period. This indicates that reversal is a pricing error due to excessive liquidity provision from uninformed retail traders instead of a price correction from a temporary price concession due to a lack of liquidity. Keywords: Intraday reversal; Liquidity; Chinese market (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:dyncon:v:136:y:2022:i:c:s0165188922000185 DOI: 10.1016/j.jedc.2022.104313 Access Statistics for this article Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control is currently edited by J. Bullard, C. Chiarella, H. Dawid, C. H. Hommes, P. Klein and C. Otrok More articles in Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control from Elsevier |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.