Abatement R&D, market imperfections, and environmental policy in an endogenous growth model
Hsun Chu and
Ching-chong Lai
Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2014, vol. 41, issue C, 20-37
Abstract:
We develop an endogenous growth model featuring environmental externalities, abatement R&D, and market imperfections. We compare the economic performances under three distinct regimes that encompass public abatement, private abatement without tax recycling, and private abatement with tax recycling. It is found that the benefit arising from private abatement will be larger if the degree of the firms’ monopoly power is greater. With a reasonably high degree of monopoly power, a mixed abatement policy by which the government recycles environmental tax revenues to subsidize the private abatement R&D is a plausible way of reaching the highest growth rate and welfare.
Keywords: Private abatement R&D; Market imperfections; Endogenous growth (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: H23 O32 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (20)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165188914000566
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
Working Paper: Abatement R&D, Market Imperfections, and Environmental Policy in an Endogenous Growth Model (2013) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:dyncon:v:41:y:2014:i:c:p:20-37
DOI: 10.1016/j.jedc.2014.02.011
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control is currently edited by J. Bullard, C. Chiarella, H. Dawid, C. H. Hommes, P. Klein and C. Otrok
More articles in Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().