Sovereign risk, bank funding and investors’ pessimism
Ester Faia ()
Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2017, vol. 79, issue C, 79-96
Evidence shows that sovereign risk increases funding cost and risk of banks highly exposed to it. I build a model that rationalizes this fact. Banks act as delegated monitors and invest in risky projects and in risky sovereign bonds. As investors hear rumors of increased asset risk, they run the bank through an information coordination game. Banks could rollover liquidity in repo market using government bonds as collateral, but as sovereign risk raises collateral values shrink. Overall banks’ liquidity falls (its cost increases) and so does banks’ credit. The model features a balance sheet, a collateral channel and a liquidity channel of sovereign risk. The latter two play a major role in the fiscal transmission.
Keywords: Liquidity risk; Sovereign risk; Banks’ funding costs (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E5 G3 E6 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Working Paper: Sovereign Risk, Bank Funding and Investors' Pessimism (2016)
Working Paper: Sovereign risk, bank funding and investors' pessimism (2016)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:dyncon:v:79:y:2017:i:c:p:79-96
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control is currently edited by J. Bullard, C. Chiarella, H. Dawid, C. H. Hommes, P. Klein and C. Otrok
More articles in Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dana Niculescu ().