Attitudes to Entry Fees to National Parks: Results and Policy Implications from a Queensland Case Study
Clevo Wilson () and
Clement Tisdell
Economic Analysis and Policy, 2004, vol. 34, issue 1, 79-102
Abstract:
Abstract: This paper examines visitor attitudes and whether visitors are willing to pay to enter Lamington National Park and under what circumstances they would do so. First a sample of visitors is asked a general (normative) question as to whether visitors should pay to visit Lamington National Park and in another question (positive) they are asked whether they would be more willing to pay if the money collected would be invested in the park to improve visitor facilities and conservation work. The results show that visitors are more willing to accept the "user-pays" principle if the money will be used for the benefit of the national park and its visitors. It was found that foreigners are more in support of a "user-pays" fee than Australians, and among Australians, those visitors from Queensland are the least willing to accept the idea of a "user-pays" fee to enter the park. The results indicate that if visitors can be shown the benefits (both for visitors and for conservation) of charging an entry fee, then visitors are more likely to support such a concept than when they are unaware of the benefits of a user-fee. The study shows that on average foreigners are willing to pay more than Australians. Finally, the regression results identify significant factors that influence respondents' attitudes about whether or not visitors should pay to visit Lamington National Park. They also specify suggested amounts to visit the national park.
JEL-codes: Q26 Q51 Q58 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2004
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592604500061
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
Working Paper: Attitudes to entry fees to national parks: results and policy implications from a Queensland case study (2003) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:34:y:2004:i:1:p:79-102
Access Statistics for this article
Economic Analysis and Policy is currently edited by Clevo Wilson
More articles in Economic Analysis and Policy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().