Portfolio choice after retirement: Should self-annuitisation strategies hold more equities?

Osei K. Wiafe, Anup Basu and En Te Chen

Economic Analysis and Policy, 2020, vol. 65, issue C, 241-255

Abstract: We compare the performance of alternative investment strategies in the decumulation phase for retirees who self-annuitise. We find that portfolios with constant high exposure to equities, as well as portfolios that increase exposures to equities over time, consistently outperform conservative portfolios which avoid investment in equities or the conventional lifecycle portfolios which reduce allocation to equities over time. While an increasing equity glidepath improves the performance of an investment strategy, the allocations to equities at the start of retirement is critical. Using a ‘utility of terminal wealth’ approach that allows for loss aversion as in prospect theory of Kahneman and Tversky (1979), we find a growth portfolio with very high (but not total) exposure to equities to dominate the alternative strategies at low and moderate thresholds. With further increases in wealth threshold levels, a strategy with an all equity allocation becomes dominant. The lifecycle portfolio is dominated by the ‘reverse lifecycle’ portfolio at all threshold levels. Finally, for retirees who defer annuitisation, we find strategies with a higher equity component have greater likelihood of outperforming an immediate annuitisation strategy in terms of generating a guaranteed income late in retirement.

Keywords: Self-annuitisation; Retirement investment; Lifecycle fund; Shortfall risk; Loss aversion; Guaranteed income (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G11 G17 J26 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592619304394
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:65:y:2020:i:c:p:241-255

DOI: 10.1016/j.eap.2020.02.012

Access Statistics for this article

Economic Analysis and Policy is currently edited by Clevo Wilson

More articles in Economic Analysis and Policy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().