Choice and expenditure: A double hurdle model of private tutoring in Qatar
Brian W. Mandikiana
Economic Analysis and Policy, 2021, vol. 71, issue C, 1-15
Abstract:
Deciding whether to use private tutoring services is now a common choice many households are facing globally. This paper presents new evidence for Qatar’s case to shed light on the demand for private tutoring. The household demand for private tutoring is estimated using the double hurdle model. A sample of 1132 parents of students in the 8th, 9th, 11th, and 12th grade from the 2012 Qatar Education Survey (QES) is used to establish correlates of the use of and expenditure on private tutoring. The Qatar Education Study is a nationally representative study of students, parents, teachers, and administrators. The findings indicate that demographic, socioeconomic, student and school characteristics affect the decision to participate in private tutoring and the amount households spend on private tutoring. Nevertheless, the effect of these characteristics on participation differs between Qataris and non-Qataris. Also, student grade is the only common factor that influences participation and expenditure decisions. Besides, male household heads and males students increase expenditure on private tutoring. These findings suggest the importance of socioeconomic factors, gender, and student grade policy interventions focusing on private tutoring. Relevant policies for different stakeholders in the education sector are discussed.
Keywords: Double Hurdle; Economics; Education; Private tutoring; Qatar; Shadow education (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C01 D01 I21 I24 I25 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592621000503
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:71:y:2021:i:c:p:1-15
DOI: 10.1016/j.eap.2021.04.001
Access Statistics for this article
Economic Analysis and Policy is currently edited by Clevo Wilson
More articles in Economic Analysis and Policy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().