The determinants of private flood mitigation measures in Germany — Evidence from a nationwide survey
Daniel Osberghaus
Ecological Economics, 2015, vol. 110, issue C, 36-50
Abstract:
Public flood protection cannot eliminate totally the risk of flooding. Hence, private mitigation measures which proactively protect homes from being flooded or reduce flood damage are an essential part of modern flood risk management. This study analyses private flood mitigation measures among German households. The final data set covers more than 4200 households from all parts of the country, including flood plains as well as areas which are typically not at a high risk of riverine flooding. The results suggest that the propensity to mitigate flood damage increases i.a. with past damage experience and damage expectations for the future. The latter effect can be interpreted as a ‘climate adaptation signal’ in the flood mitigation behaviour. All other factors remaining equal, a strong belief in a climate-change-induced increase of personal flood damage in the next decades correlates with an increase of the probability of flood mitigation by more than 10 percentage points. Moreover, empirical evidence for moral hazard in the flood mitigation behaviour cannot be observed. Households expecting insurance coverage do not reduce their mitigation efforts. Likewise, the expectation of government relief payments hinders mitigation only for some groups of households.
Keywords: Climate change; Adaptation; Flood mitigation; Moral hazard; Charity hazard; Germany (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D81 Q54 R22 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (52)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800914003772
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
Working Paper: The determinants of private flood mitigation measures in Germany: Evidence from a nationwide survey (2014) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:110:y:2015:i:c:p:36-50
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.12.010
Access Statistics for this article
Ecological Economics is currently edited by C. J. Cleveland
More articles in Ecological Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().