Work more and play less? Time use impacts of changing ecosystem services: The case of the invasive emerald ash borer

Benjamin Jones

Ecological Economics, 2016, vol. 124, issue C, 49-58

Abstract: Invasive alien species may have indirect impacts on human behavior through disruption of ecosystem services. Individuals in infested areas may optimally reallocate how they spend their time in response to degradations in environmental quality, for example, by altering their outdoor interactions with nature or levels of community engagement. Limited qualitative evidence is suggestive that indirect impacts of invasive species on behavior and time use may be substantial, though causally-consistent empirical evidence on the sign and magnitude of such impacts is lacking. To address this gap, this study exploits a natural experiment provided by exogenous variation in ash tree (Fraxinus spp.) coverage produced by the invasive emerald ash borer (Agrilus planipennis) to investigate changes in time use patterns across infested US counties over 2003–2013. Focusing on the labor–leisure decision, results indicate a negative and persistent relationship between emerald ash borer detection and daily outdoor leisure time as well as a positive and persistent relationship between detection and daily time spent on labor market activities. Results highlight a previously unexplored dimension of impacts created by invasive species induced ecological shocks.

Keywords: Ecological disruption; Invasive species; Labor–leisure decision; Time use; Trees; Emerald ash borer (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I12 J22 Q57 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (12)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800915303499
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:124:y:2016:i:c:p:49-58

DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.02.003

Access Statistics for this article

Ecological Economics is currently edited by C. J. Cleveland

More articles in Ecological Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().