EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Two paradoxes with one stone: A critical reading of ecological modernization

Tasos Hovardas

Ecological Economics, 2016, vol. 130, issue C, 1-7

Abstract: The current contribution aims at critically reviewing state initiatives in the frame of ecological modernization under the lenses of the labor theory of value. Further, the article addresses two phenomena related to ecological modernization that have received much attention, namely, the Porter Hypothesis and the Jevons' Paradox. State-led environmental regulation in terms of environmental legislation as well as initiatives to promote green technology can be understood as a twofold attempt, which ultimately leads to re-defining socially necessary labor time. First, state intervention would wish to remove surplus profit from polluting or resource depleting capitals through legislation, which would tend to increase socially necessary labor time in the branch of production under reference. State policy might then attempt to propel the adoption of green technology, which would tend to decrease socially necessary labor time in the sectors targeted. Through state initiatives, competition among rival capitals would be re-aligned so as to allow for conditions of production to be renewed. The Porter Hypothesis can be approached as a strategy followed by individual capitals to gain an early-mover advantage, while the Jevons' Paradox can be seen as the result of an imitation process, when rival capitals take up technological modifications launched by innovators.

Keywords: Ecological modernization; Environmental legislation; Green technology; Jevons' Paradox; Socially necessary labor time; The Porter Hypothesis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800916307704
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:130:y:2016:i:c:p:1-7

DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.06.023

Access Statistics for this article

Ecological Economics is currently edited by C. J. Cleveland

More articles in Ecological Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:130:y:2016:i:c:p:1-7