Managing Forests for Carbon and Timber: A Markov Decision Model of Uneven-aged Forest Management With Risk

Craig Johnston and Patrick Withey

Ecological Economics, 2017, vol. 138, issue C, 31-39

Abstract: This paper calculates steady state management decisions that, if followed indefinitely, provide an adaptive strategy that maximizes the value from timber and carbon sequestration when risk is present. By including carbon offsets directly in the objective function of a Markov decision process (MDP) model, we find long-term trade-offs exist between economic and ecological outcomes. An economic supply schedule is provided, which shows an exponential increase in the cost of sequestration. Moderate carbon prices effectively sequester additional CO2 from the atmosphere while having a positive impact on ecological indicators such as size and species diversity. In contrast, high carbon prices promote more of a monoculture in order to maximize expected forest value in the long run from carbon sequestration. This study finds evidence that the optimal adaptive decisions are sensitive to the magnitude of carbon prices, and consequently, so too are ecological outcomes. While some governments acknowledge the influence carbon markets have on the ecological integrity of the forest, fluctuations in carbon prices within a cap-and-trade market likely influence the optimal decision making of the forest manager, and thus, the ecological landscape of the forest itself.

Keywords: Markov decision process; Carbon offsets; Management; Diversity; Risk (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800916307492
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:138:y:2017:i:c:p:31-39

DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.03.023

Access Statistics for this article

Ecological Economics is currently edited by C. J. Cleveland

More articles in Ecological Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().