Measuring gender diversity in public surveys: Implications for environmental values and sustainable choices in Europe
Joop de Boer and
Harry Aiking
Ecological Economics, 2025, vol. 238, issue C
Abstract:
This study addresses the knowledge gap about gender, environmental values and sustainable choices due to current research in which (potentially) gender-diverse persons, if they are recognized at all, are dropped from the analysis of public surveys. Its novelty is that we cumulated the numbers of (potentially) gender-diverse persons in samples from general populations (Eurobarometer surveys) and focused the analysis on relationships between expanded gender options, ideological values, and political choices of environment and climate (henceforth green) issues over others. (Potentially) gender-diverse persons were primarily identified in countries where people trusted each other and in online over face-to-face interviews. In 13 high-trust countries (N = 48,125), 131 participants self-identified as (potentially) gender diverse. In these countries, (potentially) gender-diverse persons showed different value preferences (favoring Human rights, Respect for the planet, Equality, and Solidarity) and more left-leaning political preferences than binary genders. Also, they scored higher on green issue salience; a stepwise multilevel regression analysis revealed that this difference decreased after inclusion of the values (Respect for the planet, Solidarity, Human rights) and left-right self-placement, controlling for individual- and country-level covariates. Whereas the binary genders exhibited—on average—small differences between women and men, the expanded gender options improved analytical outcomes, indicating that (potentially) gender-diverse persons may be more receptive to ideals of a just world and a healthy planet. Hence, recognizing and including gender-diverse persons in cross-national surveys not only enhances inclusivity but also yields distinct patterns in policy-relevant preferences—offering vital insights for research and policy-making in sustainability transitions.
Keywords: Sustainability; Gender-inclusivity; Green issue salience; Social justice; Care for the planet (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800925002265
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:238:y:2025:i:c:s0921800925002265
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108743
Access Statistics for this article
Ecological Economics is currently edited by C. J. Cleveland
More articles in Ecological Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().