The threat of weighting biases in environmental decision analysis

Raimo P. Hämäläinen and Susanna Alaja

Ecological Economics, 2008, vol. 68, issue 1-2, 556-569

Abstract: We investigate the existence of biases, in particular the so called splitting bias, in a real environmental decision analysis case. The splitting bias refers to a situation where presenting an attribute in more detail may increase the weight it receives. We test whether the splitting bias can be eliminated or reduced through instruction and training. The case was the regulation of a lake-river system and the test group consisted of local residents and university students. The test groups carried out attribute weightings with different value tree structures. Our results show that the splitting bias remains a real threat. In the weighting experiments most students avoided the bias. However, nearly all of the local residents showed a systematic splitting bias so that the total weight of the attributes grew in proportion to the number of sub-attributes included. We discuss ways to eliminate the biases by balanced problem structuring.

Keywords: Environmental; decision; making; Multicriteria; decision; analysis; Splitting; bias; Structuring (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2008
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (21)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921-8009(08)00253-X
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:68:y:2008:i:1-2:p:556-569

Access Statistics for this article

Ecological Economics is currently edited by C. J. Cleveland

More articles in Ecological Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().