Comparing land-use alternatives: Using the ecosystem services concept to define a multi-criteria decision analysis
Veronika Fontana,
Anna Radtke,
Valérie Bossi Fedrigotti,
Ulrike Tappeiner,
Erich Tasser,
Stefan Zerbe and
Thomas Buchholz
Ecological Economics, 2013, vol. 93, issue C, 128-136
Abstract:
In landscape planning, land-use types need to be compared including the ecosystem services they provide. With multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA), ecological economics offers a useful tool for environmental questions but mostly case-specific criteria are applied. This, however, makes it difficult to compare findings. Therefore, we present a systematic framework that includes the ecosystem services as criteria into MCDA. The ecological quantification of the provided ecosystem services is combined with the assigned importance of the single ecosystem services. In a case study from the central Alps, we compared three land-use alternatives resulting from land-use change caused by socio-economic pressures: traditional larch (Larix decidua) meadow, spruce forest (abandonment) and intensive meadow (intensification).
Keywords: Multi-criteria decision analysis; Ecosystem services; Cultural services; Land-use change; PROMETHEE; Indicator; Stakeholder (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (34)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800913001651
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:93:y:2013:i:c:p:128-136
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.05.007
Access Statistics for this article
Ecological Economics is currently edited by C. J. Cleveland
More articles in Ecological Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().