The absence of deprivation as a measure of social well-being: An empirical investigation

Brice Magdalou and Patrick Moyes ()

Economics Letters, 2012, vol. 116, issue 1, 75-79

Abstract: The generalised Lorenz criterion is widely used for making welfare comparisons within and across countries on the basis of their income distributions. Experimental studies have challenged this way of proceeding by showing that the principle of transfers, which underlies the generalised Lorenz criterion, does not meet with widespread agreement among the public that theorists would have expected. We propose to substitute the non-deprivation quasi-ordering introduced by Chakravarty (1997) for the generalised Lorenz criterion. This criterion is less demanding than the generalised Lorenz criterion as it builds on a weaker version of the principle of transfers and it is therefore more likely to be accepted by the public. We use income data from the Luxembourg Income Study for 17 countries in order to contrast the generalised Lorenz and the non-deprivation criteria. Although the non-deprivation quasi-ordering is less decisive than the generalised Lorenz criterion, it is shown that the former approximates the latter surprisingly well.

Keywords: Progressive transfers; Welfare; Inequality; Deprivation; Lorenz dominance (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D30 D63 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165176512000274
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
Working Paper: The Absence of Deprivation as a Measure of Social Well-Being. An Empirical Investigation (2012)
Working Paper: The absence of deprivation as a measure of social well-being: An empirical investigation (2012)
Working Paper: The absence of deprivation as a measure of social well-being: An empirical investigation (2012)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:116:y:2012:i:1:p:75-79

DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2012.01.011

Access Statistics for this article

Economics Letters is currently edited by Economics Letters Editorial Office

More articles in Economics Letters from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().