EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

One theory for two different risk premia

Emmanuelle Gabillon ()

Economics Letters, 2012, vol. 116, issue 2, 157-160

Abstract: Generally, in the standard presentation of the expected utility model, the risk premium represents how much a risk-averse decision maker is ready to pay to have a risk eliminated. Here, however, we introduce a different risk premium: how much should a risk (which could be the return on a financial asset) yield to be acceptable to a risk-averse decision maker. Although our risk premium is derived from the Pratt bid price, it should not be confused with it: the Pratt bid price represents the monetary compensation of a risk. The standard risk premium refers to risk-avoidance; our risk premium, however, refers to risk-taking. We then reanalyze the main results concerning risk aversion under expected utility using this risk premium tool and deduce its main properties.

Keywords: Choices under uncertainty; Expected utility; Risk aversion; Risk premium (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D81 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016517651200064X
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
Working Paper: One theory for two different risk premia (2012)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:116:y:2012:i:2:p:157-160

DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2012.02.024

Access Statistics for this article

Economics Letters is currently edited by Economics Letters Editorial Office

More articles in Economics Letters from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:116:y:2012:i:2:p:157-160