EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Fairness and fairness for neighbors: The difference between the Myerson value and component-wise egalitarian solutions

Sylvain Béal, Eric Rémila and Philippe Solal

Economics Letters, 2012, vol. 117, issue 1, 263-267

Abstract: We replace the axiom of fairness used in the characterization of the Myerson value (Myerson, 1977) by fairness for neighbors in order to characterize the component-wise egalitarian solution. When a link is broken, fairness states that the two players incident to the link should be affected similarly while fairness for neighbors states that a player incident to the link and any of his other neighbors should be affected similarly. Fairness for neighbors is also used to characterize the component-wise egalitarian surplus solution and a two-step egalitarian surplus solution. These results highlight that egalitarian and marginalistic allocation rules can be obtained by applying the same equal gain/loss property to different types of players.

Keywords: Myerson value; Component-wise egalitarian solutions; Fairness; Fairness for neighbors; Two-step value (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C71 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (20)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165176512002881
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
Working Paper: Fairness and Fairness for Neighbors: The Difference between the Myerson Value and Component-Wise Egalitarian Solutions (2012)
Working Paper: Fairness and fairness for neighbors: the difference between the Myerson value and component-wise egalitarian solutions (2012) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:117:y:2012:i:1:p:263-267

DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2012.05.020

Access Statistics for this article

Economics Letters is currently edited by Economics Letters Editorial Office

More articles in Economics Letters from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-23
Handle: RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:117:y:2012:i:1:p:263-267