Divided opinion on the Fair Minimum Wage Act of 2013: Random or systematic differences?
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Donal O'Neill ()
Economics Letters, 2015, vol. 136, issue C, 175-178
This paper analyses economists’ support for the Fair Minimum Wage Act of 2013. I find systematic differences between those supporting the legislation and those opposing it, with support higher among females, young labour economists and those located further from Chicago.
Keywords: Minimum wage; Disagreement; Ideology (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A11 I23 J38 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Working Paper: Divided Opinion on The Fair Minimum Wage Act of 2013: Random or Systematic Differences (2014)
Working Paper: Divided Opinion on The Fair Minimum Wage Act of 2013: Random or Systematic Differences? (2014)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:136:y:2015:i:c:p:175-178
Access Statistics for this article
Economics Letters is currently edited by Economics Letters Editorial Office
More articles in Economics Letters from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dana Niculescu ().