EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Domain-specific risk preference and cognitive ability

Na Young Park

Economics Letters, 2016, vol. 141, issue C, 1-4

Abstract: Kahneman and Tversky’s works on Prospect Theory compellingly demonstrate that people tend to show varying risk-attitudes for gains versus losses as well as high versus low probabilities associated with the outcomes. Although some studies have found that individuals with lower cognitive skills tend to be risk averse, the literature has not addressed yet a comprehensive understanding of domain-specific risk preference variation by cognitive ability and by gains versus losses as well as high versus low probabilities associated with the outcomes. Thus, this paper attempts to provide a comprehensive picture of domain-specific risk preference variations. The results of this paper show the following: individuals with low cognitive skills tend to be risk-averse (and more risk-averse compared to people with high cognitive ability) when facing high probability of gain or low probability of loss, however risk-seeking (although less risk-seeking compared to people with high cognitive ability) when facing low probability of gain or high probability of loss. My results are consistent with the implications of Kahneman and Tversky’s prospect theory.

Keywords: Probability information weighting; Cognitive ability; Risk preference; Investment decision (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C93 D01 D03 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165176516000112
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:141:y:2016:i:c:p:1-4

DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2016.01.008

Access Statistics for this article

Economics Letters is currently edited by Economics Letters Editorial Office

More articles in Economics Letters from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:141:y:2016:i:c:p:1-4