Shopping time

Nicolas Petrosky-Nadeau, Etienne Wasmer and Shutian Zeng

Economics Letters, 2016, vol. 143, issue C, 52-60

Abstract: There is a renewed interest in macroeconomic theories of search frictions in the goods market that help solve quantitative puzzles on amplification and persistence of GDP, sales, inventory and advertisement. This requires a deeper understanding of the cyclical properties of the intensive margins of search in this market. Using the American Time Use Survey we construct an indicator of shopping time. It includes both searching and purchasing goods and is based on 25 time use categories (out of more than 400 categories). We find that average time spent shopping declined in the aggregate over the period 2008–2010 compared to 2005–2007. The decline was largest for the unemployed who went from spending more time shopping for goods than the employed to roughly the same, or even less, time. Cross-state and individual regressions indicate pro-cyclical consumer shopping time in the goods market. This evidence poses a challenge for models in which price comparisons are a driver of business cycles.

Keywords: Goods market search; Time allocation; American time use survey; Business cycles (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D12 E32 J22 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165176516300246
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
Working Paper: Shopping Time (2016)
Working Paper: Shopping Time (2016)
Working Paper: Shopping Time (2015)
Working Paper: Shopping Time (2015)
Working Paper: Shopping Time (2014)
Working Paper: Shopping Time (2014)
Working Paper: Shopping Time (2014)
Working Paper: Shopping Time (2014)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:143:y:2016:i:c:p:52-60

DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2016.02.003

Access Statistics for this article

Economics Letters is currently edited by Economics Letters Editorial Office

More articles in Economics Letters from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().