Does group discussion lead to better informed and more strategic market entry decisions?
Zahra Murad ()
Economics Letters, 2016, vol. 144, issue C, 25-28
We investigate the possibility of group discussion serving as an implicit information channel to eliminate biased entry decisions into experimental markets. We find that groups are more informed than individuals in their beliefs. Nevertheless they make similarly biased market entry decisions failing to learn from feedback and repetition.
Keywords: Experimental market entry games; Group decision making; Information (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C72 C91 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:144:y:2016:i:c:p:25-28
Access Statistics for this article
Economics Letters is currently edited by Economics Letters Editorial Office
More articles in Economics Letters from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Nithya Sathishkumar ().